Assessment vendors usually treat compliance as paperwork bolted on at procurement. Equilibrium was built the other way round: the consent record, the audit log and the bias audit are product surfaces your team uses, not documents we email you.
Compliance centre
What ships in the product
Consent ledger
Every consent is purpose-specific, versioned to the exact text shown, and timestamped. Revocation is a first-class action: it stops future processing and flags the aggregates the person contributed to.
Maps to GDPR Art 7
Maps to EU AI Act Art 26
Supports state AI notice laws
Exportable audit trail
Append-only logging of every score-affecting event and every report view: who, when, which norm version, which item parameters, which export. Customers export the whole trail as CSV or JSON, it is your record, not ours.
Record-keeping that can support LL144 duties; recruiter features currently switched off
Maps to EU AI Act Art 12 logging
Supports SOC-style evidence requests
Bias-audit workbench
Optional, separately consented self-ID stored in a segregated table with tightened access. Per-construct distributions and impact ratios across groups and intersections, using both the four-fifths rule and a 2-SD test, exported as a dated audit artefact.
Bias analysis tools that can support an LL144-style audit (no independent audit completed)
Applies the Uniform Guidelines four-fifths test
Maps to Illinois and Colorado AI provisions
Human-in-the-loop gates
Any org-side view that could inform a decision requires a named reviewer and a written rationale before it can be exported. Reviewers whose median review time falls under ten seconds are flagged as rubber-stamping.
Maps to GDPR Art 22
Maps to EU AI Act Art 14 human oversight
Notice manager
Per-region compliance modes (NYC, IL, TX, CA, CO, EU) switch on the matching templates: pre-use disclosure, adverse-outcome notice workflow, and a dispute and data-correction queue with a 30-day SLA tracker.
LL144 candidate notice: not applicable while recruiter features are switched off
Supports state pre-use disclosure
Maps to EU AI Act transparency
Data rights & retention
Subject-access export in a machine-readable, portability-shaped format. Deletion runs two ways: organisation data is removed by crypto-shredding, which destroys the subject key rather than rewrite an append-only log, and an individual consumer's data is deleted from the database on a verified request within 7 days. Retention periods are applied by a daily job, configurable per region.
Maps to GDPR Art 15, 17, 20
Supports Australian Privacy Principles 11 and 12
Data handling
Our standing posture
Assessment and account data is stored in a managed PostgreSQL database hosted in Singapore (AWS ap-southeast-1) and is never used to train AI models. Behaviour analytics is stored by Google (GA4) and PostHog in the United States. We intend to move primary storage to Australia before onboarding enterprise customers and will update this page when that happens. Questions to privacy@ajility.com.au.
Managers never see an individual's item responses, only aggregates at n ≥ 5.
Language models never generate, alter or estimate a score; generated narrative is machine-checked against the engine's own numbers before display.
No item touches health, religion, sexuality, or DSM-correlated content.
Every output is advisory. The product will not render any score as a solely-automated decision about a person.
Configurable compliance tooling, not legal advice. The features above help you evidence your obligations; they do not determine them. Validate your deployment with counsel in each jurisdiction you operate in.