A team report you can actually drive
The five live panels below — cohesion, safety spread, role coverage, cognitive diversity and risk density — are rendered by the same pure index functions the platform runs server-side. Energy concentration is in development and reports as not yet available, here and in the product. The respondents are fictional, drawn from a seeded normal distribution in your browser. Change the team and watch what the instrument notices.
Drag below five and the dashboard suppresses itself. That floor is enforced in the engine, not the UI — a manager cannot widen it, and no aggregate is computed under it.
Energy concentration will compare what motivates this group with what the role actually demands. That index is in development, so this control has no reportable output yet.
Unweighted mean of 6 team-perception statements, with its likely range.
Band shown at the minimum width this measurement supports.
People here describe safety in much the same way — the average means something.
rwg(J) = 0.90 (lead with the mean at ≥ 0.70); observed item variance 1.61 against a uniform null of 4.00.
How members are distributed
| Contribution role | Carried by | Team z | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
Direction-setter Names where this is going before anyone asks. | 4 / 9 | +0.87 | Covered |
Challenger Says the thing the room is avoiding. | 2 / 9 | +0.29 | Covered |
Finisher Closes the last 10 per cent. | 2 / 9 | +0.15 | Covered |
Synthesiser Turns four half-arguments into one decision. | 2 / 9 | +0.24 | Covered |
Connector Keeps the team joined to the rest of the business. | 1 / 9 | -0.37 | Bus factor |
Steadier Absorbs pressure so the work continues. | 3 / 9 | +0.08 | Covered |
Experimenter Tries the new tool before it is mandated. | 3 / 9 | -0.21 | Covered |
Advocate Represents the people affected by the decision. | 2 / 9 | -0.22 | Covered |
Operator Runs the machine and notices when it drifts. | 1 / 9 | -0.12 | Bus factor |
No uncovered roles in this team. Carried by exactly one person: Connector, Operator — if that person is away, the contribution goes with them.
This team sits close to the population norm for variety in decision style — neither an echo chamber nor an alignment tax.
Energy concentration — not yet available
This index compares what motivates a group with what the work demands. The motivation items are forced-choice, which cannot be scored until a Thurstonian calibration is imported, so no comparison can be computed.
We show nothing rather than a number the measurement cannot support.
Subgroups are tenure bands with at least three people. Which member sits where is never shown, exported or logged.
Run this on a team that exists
An 18-minute assessment per person produces every panel above, plus each individual's own report — which they see first, in full, before any aggregate is drawn.